الخلاصة:
Abstract: This study falls within the investigations of pilgrims, specifically the argumentation of satire in the literature of Mustafa Sadiq Al-Rafei, in his criticism of two prominent figures of literature: Taha Hussein and Al-Akkad. And satire, as well as the problem of why we mock?, and how literary criticism tends towards the satirical pilgrims, as we touched on two other chapters, the first of which dealt with the battle of Al-Rafi’i with Taha Hussein, especially the battle of pre-Islamic poetry, appended to applied investigations in which we investigated the strategies of pilgrims in the satirical criticism discourse of Al- Rafi’i from Starting points, mechanisms, and others, as well as the last chapter with Al-Akkad, in which we touched on his critical battle with him, especially the battle over the ships, to be followed by applied investigations in which we touched on the satirical pilgrims in the critical discourse of Al-Rafi’i, from rhetorical and logical mechanisms, as well as what is known as homosexual criticism and argumentative relations. Let us stand on the limits of the satirical critical discourse and what distinguished it from the argumentative power he employed in it, and he used it with many mechanisms in which he gave a graphic approach such as metaphor and others, or invented new methods such as homosexual criticism, and logical and quasi-logical mechanisms, to enhance the strength of his responses in the battles he fought. against his opponen
