Abstract:
This study, entitled "Sexual Correction in Islamic Jurisprudence",
comes from the idea of the polarizing conflict between contact of people's belief
that prejudice to sexual identity is a change in God's creation at all, and
compliance with the legal texts ordering the removal of harm wherever it is found,
or by teleological logic, is it mere whim or is it a fulfillment for the Divine
purpose, which is self-preservation, posing the following problem: What is the
position of Islamic jurisprudence on the issue of sexual correction? And who is
primarily concerned with it? And what is the ruling of other similar interventions?
In order to answer that problem, the study adopted the descriptive approach
in accordance with the rule of “judging a thing is a branch of its visualization” to
give a comprehensive and preventative conception of the issue, as it followed the
analytical approach in dismantling the details of the issue and releasing it with its
origins and then extracting its legal rulings, and for the position of Islamic
jurisprudence on sexual correction,it required them to work with the inductive
approach by tracing its branches to the faculties of Sharia.
And on the foregoing, while the study is divided into two sections: the first
of which is devoted to visualizing the calamity by explaining the terms and
concepts in jurisprudence and medicine, and the second for its jurisprudential
application by presenting its origins that fall under it and separating it from sexual
transformation by presenting the words, the evidence in both, ending with the
judgment on them after fulfilling them The major jurisprudence rules, the
necessary colleges, the legal regulations, as well as the different bodies of the
collective diligence.
This study concluded by saying that sexual correction is permissible in
favor of organic hermaphroditism, and the prohibition of sexual transformation
for the mentally disturbed, and for the healthy, from a fortiori.