الخلاصة:
Rulings on expense for women in Islamic jurisprudence
Prepared by: Naima Kacem Hadj smail
The supervision of Dr: Bakir Daoud Hammoudine
The research tackled a realistic, practical, and vital issue, namely: the
jurisprudential rulings for the maintenance of women. The focus of his attention
was to clarify the path of expense of the woman in two terms: considering the
woman as a receiver of the expense, and as a spender, in order to answer the
questions mainly: Who is the woman's expence obligatory for? To whom is a
woman obliged to spend? What are the conditions for this expence in each case?
It follows from the scientific curricula the comparative approach. It compared
the five schools of thought: Ibadi, Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali, using the
descriptive method, and the analytical method.
Given the importance of visualization before judgment; The research opened
by controlling the concept of the expence of woman, its types, and the reasons for
it according to the jurists, and the clarification of the matters that are included in
this expence.
The study detailed the ruling on the expence of woman as she is spending on
her by examining the forms of spending on the woman by others, and then he did
the same regarding the ruling on the expence of a woman as she is spender, starting
with the expence she owes for herself, then for others.
And because the mandatory judgment is affected by the Positional judgments;
The research meant studying the conditions stipulated by the jurists regarding the
maintenance of the woman, presenting them in a way in which the readers could
easily control them for research.
