الخلاصة:
This Master’s thesis deals with the fundamental rules and their impact on the
jurisprudential (Fiqh) difference by practical examples from the RAJRAJI book
“Manahij Eltahssil” where its problematic is: to what extent did the fundamentalist
rules influence the jurisprudential difference in general and on Al-Malikiya in
particular? For this reason I choose the book “Manahij Eltahssil” as a model study.
In order to answer this question, I divided my plan into : to introduce the topic in
all its aspects. A preliminary study, devoted to the definition of fundamentalist
rules and their characteristics, the jurisprudential difference and its types,
following by the definition of the book "Manahij etahsil" and its author “Abi Said
Rajaji”. After that, I start the first section by exposing the basis of Islamic legal
judgment while the second section is devoted to semantic rules. However, the third
section contains the fundamental rules related to the legal evidence (argument)
dependency. Finally, we finished with a conclusion summarizing all the most
important results such : as the rules of fundamentalism had an impact on the
difference of jurisprudence between the schools, they had also an impact on the
difference between Maliki scientists.
