حق الخصوصية للمراسلات الخاصة والحماية الفقهية والقانونية لها -دراسة مقارنة-

Abstract

The difference that the right to privacy knew was not a matter of controversy as much as it was an indication of its importance as an expression of its development. It was rejected at the beginning of its inception and then the legislation retracted its rejection. Scientific and technological means and the multiplicity of threats and the call for the necessity of including it within the personal rights because of the guarantees it enjoys, and from it, this debate was only an expression of the development of this right and its transition from one stage to another in search of protection that ensures its respect. The violation of the right to privacy can also be achieved in one of the three forms. It may be by violating it or violating it with regard to matters that require confidentiality, such as the sanctity of the home and the confidentiality of correspondence and calls, and by revealing it, such as publishing the person’s financial aspect, political opinion and religious belief because it may be known to others, but disclosure in some situations causes Harm to the person, even if it is to praise him, and not to raise some matters that have passed over time and have become obsolete by being silent about them, and the individual seeks to leave them in limbo, as raising them constitutes a prejudice to him.