Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://173.13.1.9:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorحسان, عبد الحاكم-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-04T10:30:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-04T10:30:24Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.univ-ghardaia.dz:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4056-
dc.description.abstract"The authority of the criminal judge to assess anecdotal evidence in Islamic jurisprudence and Algerian law", a study in which I tackled the authority entrusted to the judge to assess both testimony and confession according to what was listed by Islamic jurisprudents and what the Algerian legislator went to in the Code of Criminal Procedure. I first defined the estimative authority, its legality, and its most important principle which is the personal conviction of the criminal judge, then i mentioned linguistic definition and jurist's of the four schools definitions besides explainer's of positive law definitions of testimony and confession. I tackled the conditions of testimony and confession in law and Shariaa in details. Finally, i shed light on the judge's assessment of these anecdotal evidences comparing how compatible and contrasting are these legislations in deciding such issues.EN_en
dc.publisherجامعة غردايةEN_en
dc.subjectسلطة القاضي الجنائيEN_en
dc.subjectالأدلة القوليةEN_en
dc.subjectالفقه الإسلاميEN_en
dc.subjectالقانون الجنائي الجزائريEN_en
dc.titleسلطة القاضي الجنائي في تقدير الأدلة القولية في الفقه الإسلامي و القانون الجنائي الجزائريEN_en
dc.typeThesisEN_en
Appears in Collections:Thèses de Doctorat

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
210.03.08.pdf3.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.