القضاء في الدولتين الرستمية و الزيانية دراسة مقارنة

Abstract

Title: Jurisdiction in the Rustamic and Zaynian States - Comparative Study-

The judiciary is one of the most important jobs in Islamic countries in general and in Rustam and Zeinian countries in particular. The establishment of the Rastami judiciary with the founder of the state Abdulrahman bin Rustam in 160 AH / 777 AD in Tahrat. The Zayian state, founded by Yughmrasen Ben Zian in 633 AH / 1236 AD, It has established its structures and has taken care of its own systems, especially judicial ones.

The judiciary is responsible for justice within the countries, as it separates their deductions for the decisive disintegration of the conflict ..., it is of great importance to the two countries, as paid with great attention by jurists, which earned the religious character and prestige of the public and private.

Both the two countries acted as judges, and the process of litigation took place inside the mosques or the court, and even in the homes of the judges according to the nature of the case and the time it took place. The Rastime imams and the Zayani imams had paid much attention to the judiciary by taking it by themselves and not interfering in judicial matters in terms of intercession to one of the litigants interfere in the affairs of the judges, in addition to taking a house and a servant serving the judge, as well as a fee from the Muslim House of Muslims and all this in order to achieve justice, stability and independence. The judges also have a stamp and a record in which they restrict their sentences and, at the latest, seal their signature to the governor or the police to apply the sentence to the offender.

In my study of the subject, I touched on the Islamic judiciary and its related in general, and in the Rustamian and Zayni's countries in particular, with comparative comparative study between them, highlighting the characteristics and characteristics of each country in this area of interest of the ruling authority and the

influence of the doctrine. The two countries had judicial systems that contributed to their stability, along with other plans that complement them. Thus, in the Middle West, under the rule of the Rustomis and Zayani's, the judiciary was strict and strict in applying the provisions of Islamic law and implementing the borders against those who were misdemeanor Discrimination, bias or Injustice.